我正在尝试适应 Martinho Fernandes's sample std::future implementation这样它就可以在带有 Boost 1.40 的 C++03 下运行，作为一种廉价的权宜之计，直到我可以访问 Boost 1.41 或 C++11 本身。

我的改编并不漂亮，当然也不是最佳的，但我希望它至少能奏效。但是，在 gcc 版本 4.4.1 20090725 (Red Hat 4.4.1-2) 下，它不会。

这是futures.h:

#include <boost/thread.hpp>
#include <boost/shared_ptr.hpp>
#include <stdexcept>

template <typename T>
class future;

template <typename T>
class promise;

namespace detail {

    template <typename T>
    struct future_shared_state
    {
    public:

        void wait(boost::mutex& m) const
        {
            boost::mutex::scoped_lock lock(m, boost::adopt_lock);
            while (!(state || error))
                available.wait(lock);
        }

        T& get()
        {
            if (state)
                return *state;

            if (error)
                throw *error;

            throw std::runtime_error("WTF");
        }

        template <typename U>
        void set_value(const U& value)
        {
            state = value;
            available.notify_all();
        }

        void set_exception(boost::shared_ptr<std::exception> e)
        {
            error = e;
            available.notify_all();
        }

    private:
        mutable boost::condition_variable available;
        boost::optional<T> state;
        boost::shared_ptr<std::exception> error;

        friend class promise<T>;
        friend class future<T>;
        mutable boost::mutex m;
    };

}

template <typename T>
struct future
{
public:
    future() {}
    ~future() {}

    T get()
    {
        boost::shared_ptr<detail::future_shared_state<T> > old_box;
        swap(box, old_box);

        boost::mutex::scoped_lock lock(old_box->m);
        old_box->wait(old_box->m);
        return old_box->get();
    }

    bool valid() const
    {
        return !!box;
    }

    void wait() const
    {
        boost::mutex::scoped_lock lock(box->m);
        box->wait(box->m);
    }

private:
    boost::shared_ptr<detail::future_shared_state<T> > box;

    friend class promise<T>;
    future(boost::shared_ptr<detail::future_shared_state<T> > const& box) : box(box) {}
};

template <typename T>
struct promise
{
public:
    promise() : box(new detail::future_shared_state<T>) {}
    ~promise() {}   

    void swap(promise& other)
    {
        box.swap(other.box);
    }

    future<T> get_future()
    {
        return future<T>(box);
    }

    void set_value(T const& value)
    {
        box->set_value(value);
    }

    void set_exception(boost::shared_ptr<std::exception> e)
    {
        box->set_exception(e);
    }

private:
    boost::shared_ptr<detail::future_shared_state<T> > box;
};

template<typename T>
void swap(promise<T>& lhs, promise<T>& rhs)
{
    lhs.swap(rhs);
}

和执行:

#include "futures.h"
#include <iostream>
#include <boost/thread.hpp>

void foo(promise<unsigned int> p)
{
    sleep(1);
    p.set_value(42);
}

int main()
{
    promise<unsigned int> p;
    future <unsigned int> f(p.get_future());

    boost::thread t(&foo, p);
    std::cout << f.get() << std::endl;

    t.join();
}

// g++ -O0 -g test.cpp -lboost_thread -pthread -o test

始终如一的结果如下:

42
test: /usr/local/include/boost/thread/pthread/mutex.hpp:45: boost::mutex::~mutex(): Assertion `!pthread_mutex_destroy(&m)' failed.
Aborted

来自 gdb 的回溯:

#0  0x00679422 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1  0x002ac781 in *__GI_raise (sig=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:64
#2  0x002ae04a in *__GI_abort () at abort.c:88
#3  0x002a58de in *__GI___assert_fail (assertion=0x805de56 "!pthread_mutex_destroy(&m)",
    file=0x805de24 "/usr/local/include/boost/thread/pthread/mutex.hpp", line=45, function=0x805e071 "boost::mutex::~mutex()")
    at assert.c:78
#4  0x0804bdd5 in boost::mutex::~mutex (this=0x806c9c0, __in_chrg=<value optimized out>)
    at /usr/local/include/boost/thread/pthread/mutex.hpp:45
#5  0x0804d020 in detail::future_shared_state<unsigned int>::~future_shared_state (this=0x806c980,
    __in_chrg=<value optimized out>) at futures.h:35
#6  0x0804d099 in boost::checked_delete<detail::future_shared_state<unsigned int> > (x=0x806c980)
    at /usr/local/include/boost/checked_delete.hpp:34
#7  0x0804d69c in boost::detail::sp_counted_impl_p<detail::future_shared_state<unsigned int> >::dispose (this=0x806c9e0)
    at /usr/local/include/boost/smart_ptr/detail/sp_counted_impl.hpp:78
#8  0x0804bb68 in boost::detail::sp_counted_base::release (this=0x806c9e0)
    at /usr/local/include/boost/smart_ptr/detail/sp_counted_base_gcc_x86.hpp:145
#9  0x0804bbfe in boost::detail::shared_count::~shared_count (this=0xbffff634, __in_chrg=<value optimized out>)
    at /usr/local/include/boost/smart_ptr/detail/shared_count.hpp:217
#10 0x0804c2d4 in boost::shared_ptr<detail::future_shared_state<unsigned int> >::~shared_ptr (this=0xbffff630,
    __in_chrg=<value optimized out>) at /usr/local/include/boost/smart_ptr/shared_ptr.hpp:169
#11 0x0804c535 in promise<unsigned int>::~promise (this=0xbffff630, __in_chrg=<value optimized out>) at futures.h:125
#12 0x0804b937 in main () at test.cpp:19

撇开糟糕的风格不谈，我的互斥锁有什么问题？

最佳答案

future_shared_state::value 和future_shared_state::error、set_value 和set_exception 访问存在数据竞争他们没有获得 wait 用来保护他们的互斥体。

您遇到的实际问题是由于您在 future_shared_state::wait 的调用方中使用了 boost::mutex::scoped_lock:您已成功避免锁定在 future_shared_state::wait 中使用 adopt_lock 互斥两次，但是两个 scoped_lock 析构函数都运行并解锁互斥锁两次。

这两个问题都可以通过将锁定全部置于 future_shared_state ( Demo at Coliru ) 内部轻松解决:

namespace detail {

    template <typename T>
    struct future_shared_state
    {
    public:

        void wait() const
        {
            boost::mutex::scoped_lock lock(m);
            while (!(state || error))
                available.wait(lock);
        }

        T& get()
        {
            if (state)
                return *state;

            if (error)
                throw *error;

            throw std::runtime_error("WTF");
        }

        template <typename U>
        void set_value(const U& value)
        {
            {
                boost::mutex::scoped_lock lock(m);
                state = value;
            }
            available.notify_all();
        }

        void set_exception(boost::shared_ptr<std::exception> e)
        {
            {
                boost::mutex::scoped_lock lock(m);
                error = e;
            }
            available.notify_all();
        }

    private:
        mutable boost::condition_variable available;
        boost::optional<T> state;
        boost::shared_ptr<std::exception> error;

        mutable boost::mutex m;
    };

}

template <typename T>
class promise;

template <typename T>
struct future
{
public:
    future() {}
    ~future() {}

    T get()
    {
        boost::shared_ptr<detail::future_shared_state<T> > old_box;
        swap(box, old_box);

        old_box->wait();
        return old_box->get();
    }

    bool valid() const
    {
        return !!box;
    }

    void wait() const
    {
        box->wait();
    }

private:
    boost::shared_ptr<detail::future_shared_state<T> > box;

    friend class promise<T>;
    future(boost::shared_ptr<detail::future_shared_state<T> > const& box) : box(box) {}
};

template <typename T>
struct promise
{
public:
    promise() : box(new detail::future_shared_state<T>) {}
    ~promise() {}   

    void swap(promise& other)
    {
        box.swap(other.box);
    }

    future<T> get_future()
    {
        return future<T>(box);
    }

    void set_value(T const& value)
    {
        box->set_value(value);
    }

    void set_exception(boost::shared_ptr<std::exception> e)
    {
        box->set_exception(e);
    }

private:
    boost::shared_ptr<detail::future_shared_state<T> > box;
};

关于c++ - 在 C++03 的 `std::future` 实现中，互斥锁有什么问题？，我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23066511/