我刚刚注意到，在 .NET 4.5 中，每个 Dispatcher.BeginInvoke/InvokeAsync 回调都在其自己非常独特的同步上下文( 的实例)上执行DispatcherSynchronizationContext). 这种变化背后的原因是什么？

以下简单的 WPF 应用说明了这一点:

using System;
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.Threading;
using System.Windows;
using System.Windows.Threading;

namespace WpfApplication
{
    public partial class MainWindow : Window
    {
        public MainWindow()
        {
            InitializeComponent();

            Action test = null;
            var i = 0;

            test = () =>
            {
                var sc = SynchronizationContext.Current;

                Dispatcher.CurrentDispatcher.InvokeAsync(() => 
                {
                    Debug.Print("same context #" + i + ": " +
                        (sc == SynchronizationContext.Current));
                    if ( i < 10 ) 
                    {
                        i++;
                        test();
                    }
                });
            };

            this.Loaded += (s, e) => test();
        }
    }
}

输出:

same context #0: False
same context #1: False
same context #2: False
...

Setting BaseCompatibilityPreferences.ReuseDispatcherSynchronizationContextInstance to true restores the .NET 4.0 behavior:

public partial class App : Application
{
    static App()
    {
        BaseCompatibilityPreferences.ReuseDispatcherSynchronizationContextInstance = true;
    }
}

same context #0: True
same context #1: True
same context #2: True
...

Studying the .NET sources for DispatcherOperation shows this:

[SecurityCritical]
private void InvokeImpl() 
{
    SynchronizationContext oldSynchronizationContext = SynchronizationContext.Current;

    try 
    {
        // We are executing under the "foreign" execution context, but the 
        // SynchronizationContext must be for the correct dispatcher. 
        SynchronizationContext.SetSynchronizationContext(new DispatcherSynchronizationContext(_dispatcher));

        // Invoke the delegate that does the work for this operation.
        _result = _dispatcher.WrappedInvoke(_method, _args, _isSingleParameter);
    }
    finally 
    {
        SynchronizationContext.SetSynchronizationContext(oldSynchronizationContext); 
    } 
}

我不明白为什么可能需要这样做，使用 Dispatcher.BeginInvoke/InvokeAsync 排队的回调无论如何都在正确的线程上执行，该线程已经有一个实例DispatcherSynchronizationContext 安装在上面。

此更改的一个有趣的副作用是 await TaskCompletionSource.Task 继续(由 TaskCompletionSource.SetResult 触发)在 .NET 4.5 WPF 中几乎总是异步的，这与WinForms 或 v4.0 WPF ( some more details )。

最佳答案

在源码中用很长的注释进行了说明。引用自 wpf\src\Base\System\Windows\BaseCompatibilityPreferences.cs 中的 4.5.1 引用源:

    ///     WPF 4.0 had a performance optimization where it would
    ///     frequently reuse the same instance of the
    ///     DispatcherSynchronizationContext when preparing the
    ///     ExecutionContext for invoking a DispatcherOperation.  This
    ///     had observable impacts on behavior.
    ///
    ///     1) Some task-parallel implementations check the reference
    ///         equality of the SynchronizationContext to determine if the
    ///         completion can be inlined - a significant performance win.
    ///
    ///     2) But, the ExecutionContext would flow the
    ///         SynchronizationContext which could result in the same
    ///         instance of the DispatcherSynchronizationContext being the
    ///         current SynchronizationContext on two different threads.
    ///         The continuations would then be inlined, resulting in code
    ///         running on the wrong thread.
    ///
    ///     In 4.5 we changed this behavior to use a new instance of the
    ///     DispatcherSynchronizationContext for every operation, and
    ///     whenever SynchronizationContext.CreateCopy is called - such
    ///     as when the ExecutionContext is being flowed to another thread.
    ///     This has its own observable impacts:
    ///
    ///     1) Some task-parallel implementations check the reference
    ///         equality of the SynchronizationContext to determine if the
    ///         completion can be inlined - since the instances are
    ///         different, this causes them to resort to the slower
    ///         path for potentially cross-thread completions.
    ///
    ///     2) Some task-parallel implementations implement potentially
    ///         cross-thread completions by callling
    ///         SynchronizationContext.Post and Wait() and an event to be
    ///         signaled.  If this was not a true cross-thread completion,
    ///         but rather just two seperate instances of
    ///         DispatcherSynchronizationContext for the same thread, this
    ///         would result in a deadlock.

或者换句话说，他们修复了您代码中的错误 :)

关于c# - 为什么每个 Dispatcher.BeginInvoke 回调都有一个唯一的同步上下文？，我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22217477/