我正在使用以下代码来测试 try block 有多慢。令我惊讶的是,try block 使它更快。为什么?
public class Test {
int value;
public int getValue() {
return value;
}
public void reset() {
value = 0;
}
// Calculates without exception
public void method1(int i) {
value = ((value + i) / i) << 1;
// Will never be true
if ((i & 0xFFFFFFF) == 1000000000) {
System.out.println("You'll never see this!");
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
int i;
long l;
Test t = new Test();
l = System.currentTimeMillis();
t.reset();
for (i = 1; i < 100000000; i++) {
t.method1(i);
}
l = System.currentTimeMillis() - l;
System.out.println("method1 took " + l + " ms, result was "
+ t.getValue());
// using a try block
l = System.currentTimeMillis();
t.reset();
for (i = 1; i < 100000000; i++) {
try {
t.method1(i);
} catch (Exception e) {
}
}
l = System.currentTimeMillis() - l;
System.out.println("method1 with try block took " + l + " ms, result was "
+ t.getValue());
}
}
我的机器运行的是 64 位 Windows 7 和 64 位 JDK7。我得到以下结果:
method1 took 914 ms, result was 2
method1 with try block took 789 ms, result was 2
而且我已经多次运行代码,每次都得到几乎相同的结果。
更新:
这是在 Java 6 的 MacBook Pro 上运行十次测试的结果。Try-catch 使该方法更快,与在 Windows 上相同。
method1 took 895 ms, result was 2
method1 with try block took 783 ms, result was 2
--------------------------------------------------
method1 took 943 ms, result was 2
method1 with try block took 803 ms, result was 2
--------------------------------------------------
method1 took 867 ms, result was 2
method1 with try block took 745 ms, result was 2
--------------------------------------------------
method1 took 856 ms, result was 2
method1 with try block took 744 ms, result was 2
--------------------------------------------------
method1 took 862 ms, result was 2
method1 with try block took 744 ms, result was 2
--------------------------------------------------
method1 took 859 ms, result was 2
method1 with try block took 765 ms, result was 2
--------------------------------------------------
method1 took 937 ms, result was 2
method1 with try block took 767 ms, result was 2
--------------------------------------------------
method1 took 861 ms, result was 2
method1 with try block took 744 ms, result was 2
--------------------------------------------------
method1 took 858 ms, result was 2
method1 with try block took 744 ms, result was 2
--------------------------------------------------
method1 took 858 ms, result was 2
method1 with try block took 749 ms, result was 2
最佳答案
当您在同一个方法中有多个长时间运行的循环时,可以在第二个循环中触发整个方法的优化,结果不可预知。避免这种情况的一种方法是;
您会看到一些变化,有时结果不确定。即变化大于差异。
public class Test {
int value;
public int getValue() {
return value;
}
public void reset() {
value = 0;
}
// Calculates without exception
public void method1(int i) {
value = ((value + i) / i) << 1;
// Will never be true
if ((i & 0xFFFFFFF) == 1000000000) {
System.out.println("You'll never see this!");
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Test t = new Test();
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
testWithTryCatch(t);
testWithoutTryCatch(t);
}
}
private static void testWithoutTryCatch(Test t) {
t.reset();
long l = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int j = 0; j < 10; j++)
for (int i = 1; i <= 100000000; i++)
t.method1(i);
l = System.currentTimeMillis() - l;
System.out.println("without try/catch method1 took " + l + " ms, result was " + t.getValue());
}
private static void testWithTryCatch(Test t) {
t.reset();
long l = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (int j = 0; j < 10; j++)
for (int i = 1; i <= 100000000; i++)
try {
t.method1(i);
} catch (Exception ignored) {
}
l = System.currentTimeMillis() - l;
System.out.println("with try/catch method1 took " + l + " ms, result was " + t.getValue());
}
}
打印
with try/catch method1 took 9723 ms, result was 2
without try/catch method1 took 9456 ms, result was 2
with try/catch method1 took 9672 ms, result was 2
without try/catch method1 took 9476 ms, result was 2
with try/catch method1 took 8375 ms, result was 2
without try/catch method1 took 8233 ms, result was 2
with try/catch method1 took 8337 ms, result was 2
without try/catch method1 took 8227 ms, result was 2
with try/catch method1 took 8163 ms, result was 2
without try/catch method1 took 8565 ms, result was 2
从这些结果来看,使用 try/catch 的速度似乎稍慢,但并非总是如此。
在 Windows 7、Xeon E5450 和 Java 7 update 7 上运行。
关于java - 为什么添加 try block 会使程序更快?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12853391/
类classAprivatedeffooputs:fooendpublicdefbarputs:barendprivatedefzimputs:zimendprotecteddefdibputs:dibendendA的实例a=A.new测试a.foorescueputs:faila.barrescueputs:faila.zimrescueputs:faila.dibrescueputs:faila.gazrescueputs:fail测试输出failbarfailfailfail.发送测试[:foo,:bar,:zim,:dib,:gaz].each{|m|a.send(m)resc
我需要在客户计算机上运行Ruby应用程序。通常需要几天才能完成(复制大备份文件)。问题是如果启用sleep,它会中断应用程序。否则,计算机将持续运行数周,直到我下次访问为止。有什么方法可以防止执行期间休眠并让Windows在执行后休眠吗?欢迎任何疯狂的想法;-) 最佳答案 Here建议使用SetThreadExecutionStateWinAPI函数,使应用程序能够通知系统它正在使用中,从而防止系统在应用程序运行时进入休眠状态或关闭显示。像这样的东西:require'Win32API'ES_AWAYMODE_REQUIRED=0x0
当我使用Bundler时,是否需要在我的Gemfile中将其列为依赖项?毕竟,我的代码中有些地方需要它。例如,当我进行Bundler设置时:require"bundler/setup" 最佳答案 没有。您可以尝试,但首先您必须用鞋带将自己抬离地面。 关于ruby-我需要将Bundler本身添加到Gemfile中吗?,我们在StackOverflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4758609/
我有一个模型:classItem项目有一个属性“商店”基于存储的值,我希望Item对象对特定方法具有不同的行为。Rails中是否有针对此的通用设计模式?如果方法中没有大的if-else语句,这是如何干净利落地完成的? 最佳答案 通常通过Single-TableInheritance. 关于ruby-on-rails-Rails-子类化模型的设计模式是什么?,我们在StackOverflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.co
我正在使用的第三方API的文档状态:"[O]urAPIonlyacceptspaddedBase64encodedstrings."什么是“填充的Base64编码字符串”以及如何在Ruby中生成它们。下面的代码是我第一次尝试创建转换为Base64的JSON格式数据。xa=Base64.encode64(a.to_json) 最佳答案 他们说的padding其实就是Base64本身的一部分。它是末尾的“=”和“==”。Base64将3个字节的数据包编码为4个编码字符。所以如果你的输入数据有长度n和n%3=1=>"=="末尾用于填充n%
我主要使用Ruby来执行此操作,但到目前为止我的攻击计划如下:使用gemsrdf、rdf-rdfa和rdf-microdata或mida来解析给定任何URI的数据。我认为最好映射到像schema.org这样的统一模式,例如使用这个yaml文件,它试图描述数据词汇表和opengraph到schema.org之间的转换:#SchemaXtoschema.orgconversion#data-vocabularyDV:name:namestreet-address:streetAddressregion:addressRegionlocality:addressLocalityphoto:i
Rackup通过Rack的默认处理程序成功运行任何Rack应用程序。例如:classRackAppdefcall(environment)['200',{'Content-Type'=>'text/html'},["Helloworld"]]endendrunRackApp.new但是当最后一行更改为使用Rack的内置CGI处理程序时,rackup给出“NoMethodErrorat/undefinedmethod`call'fornil:NilClass”:Rack::Handler::CGI.runRackApp.newRack的其他内置处理程序也提出了同样的反对意见。例如Rack
我想用ruby编写一个小的命令行实用程序并将其作为gem分发。我知道安装后,Guard、Sass和Thor等某些gem可以从命令行自行运行。为了让gem像二进制文件一样可用,我需要在我的gemspec中指定什么。 最佳答案 Gem::Specification.newdo|s|...s.executable='name_of_executable'...endhttp://docs.rubygems.org/read/chapter/20 关于ruby-在Ruby中编写命令行实用程序
为什么4.1%2返回0.0999999999999996?但是4.2%2==0.2。 最佳答案 参见此处:WhatEveryProgrammerShouldKnowAboutFloating-PointArithmetic实数是无限的。计算机使用的位数有限(今天是32位、64位)。因此计算机进行的浮点运算不能代表所有的实数。0.1是这些数字之一。请注意,这不是与Ruby相关的问题,而是与所有编程语言相关的问题,因为它来自计算机表示实数的方式。 关于ruby-为什么4.1%2使用Ruby返
我有一个ModularSinatra应用程序,我正在尝试将Bootstrap添加到应用程序中。get'/bootstrap/application.css'doless:"bootstrap/bootstrap"end我在views/bootstrap中有所有less文件,包括bootstrap.less。我收到这个错误:Less::ParseErrorat/bootstrap/application.css'reset.less'wasn'tfound.Bootstrap.less的第一行是://CSSReset@import"reset.less";我尝试了所有不同的路径格式,但它