我需要扩展 std::basic_string 来处理路径字符串和不同的 operator+:

#include <string>

template <class t_elem, class t_traits, class t_alloc>
class path_basic_string : public std::basic_string<t_elem, t_traits, t_alloc>
{
public:
    using base_type = std::basic_string<t_elem, t_traits, t_alloc>;

    path_basic_string() = default;
    path_basic_string(const path_basic_string & ) = default;
    path_basic_string & operator =(const path_basic_string &) = default;

    path_basic_string(const base_type & r) :
        base_type(r)
    {
    }

    path_basic_string(base_type && r) :
        base_type(std::move(r))
    {
    }
};

using path_string = path_basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >;

template <class t_elem, class t_traits, class t_alloc>
inline path_basic_string<t_elem, t_traits, t_alloc> &&
    operator +(
        path_basic_string<t_elem, t_traits, t_alloc> && l,
        std::basic_string<t_elem, t_traits, t_alloc> && r)
{
    std::basic_string<t_elem, t_traits, t_alloc> && l_str = std::move(l);
    std::basic_string<t_elem, t_traits, t_alloc> && r_str = std::move(r);

    const bool has_right = !r_str.empty();
    return std::move(
        path_basic_string<t_elem, t_traits, t_alloc>{
            std::move(std::move(l_str) + (has_right ? "/" : "") + (has_right ? std::move(r_str) : std::move(std::basic_string<t_elem, t_traits, t_alloc>{})))
        });
}

template <class t_elem, class t_traits, class t_alloc>
inline path_basic_string<t_elem, t_traits, t_alloc>
    operator +(
        const path_basic_string<t_elem, t_traits, t_alloc> & l,
        const std::basic_string<t_elem, t_traits, t_alloc> & r)
{
    const std::basic_string<t_elem, t_traits, t_alloc> & l_str = l;

    const bool has_right = !r.empty();
    return path_basic_string<t_elem, t_traits, t_alloc>{
        l_str + (has_right ? "/" : "") + (has_right ? r : std::basic_string<t_elem, t_traits, t_alloc>{})
    };
}

int main()
{
    path_string a;
    std::string b;
    std::string c;
    const path_string test = a + (b + c);

    return 0;
}

在 https://godbolt.org/z/jhcWoh我有这些错误:

x86 MSVC 19 2015 U3:

/opt/compiler-explorer/windows/19.00.24210/include/xlocale(341):
warning C4530: C++ exception handler used, but unwind semantics are
not enabled. Specify /EHsc

<source>(61): error C2666: 'operator +': 3 overloads have similar
conversions

<source>(44): note: could be
'path_basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>>
operator +<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>>(const
path_basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>>
&,const
std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>>
&)'

<source>(28): note: or      
'path_basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>>
&&operator
+<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>>(path_basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>> &&,std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>>
&&)'

/opt/compiler-explorer/windows/19.00.24210/include/xstring(2310):
note: or      
'std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>>
std::operator
+<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>>(const std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>>
&,const
std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>>
&)'

/opt/compiler-explorer/windows/19.00.24210/include/xstring(2380):
note: or      
'std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>>
std::operator
+<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>>(const std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>>
&,std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>>
&&)'

/opt/compiler-explorer/windows/19.00.24210/include/xstring(2390):
note: or      
'std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>>
std::operator
+<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>>(std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>> &&,const
std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>>
&)'

/opt/compiler-explorer/windows/19.00.24210/include/xstring(2400):
note: or      
'std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>>
std::operator
+<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>>(std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>> &&,std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>>
&&)'

<source>(61): note: while trying to match the argument list
'(path_string,
std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>>)'

<source>(61): note: note: qualification adjustment (const/volatile)
may be causing the ambiguity

Compiler returned: 2

x86-64 gcc 5.4(使用 --std=c++11):

source>: In function 'int main()':

<source>:61:40: warning: ISO C++ says that these are ambiguous, even
though the worst conversion for the first is better than the worst
conversion for the second:

     const path_string test = a + (b + c);

                                        ^

<source>:44:5: note: candidate 1: path_basic_string<t_elem, t_traits,
t_alloc> operator+(const path_basic_string<t_elem, t_traits,
t_alloc>&, const std::__cxx11::basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>&)
[with t_elem = char; t_traits = std::char_traits<char>; t_alloc =
std::allocator<char>]

     operator +(

     ^

In file included from
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-5.4.0/include/c++/5.4.0/string:52:0,

                 from <source>:1:

/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-5.4.0/include/c++/5.4.0/bits/basic_string.h:4854:5:
note: candidate 2: std::__cxx11::basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>
std::operator+(const std::__cxx11::basic_string<_CharT, _Traits,
_Alloc>&, std::__cxx11::basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>&&) [with _CharT = char; _Traits = std::char_traits<char>; _Alloc = std::allocator<char>]

     operator+(const basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>& __lhs,

     ^

Compiler returned: 0

我至少知道一种解决方法。

但到底发生了什么？ 荒谬的是我必须再次重载以避免重载碰撞困惑？

更新: 通过从所有 operator+ 的所有 basic_string 类参数中删除 const 和 single reference 来修复。似乎解决了这个问题。

最佳答案

首先，使用 move-from-value 而不是 const& 和 && 重载。

path_basic_string(base_type r) :
    base_type(std::move(r))
{
}

并摆脱 base_type const& 构造函数。

其次，使该构造函数显式化:

explicit path_basic_string(base_type r) :
    base_type(std::move(r))
{
}

路径与字符串不同。

第三，清理您的 template operator+ 并使其成为 ADL“Koenig”运算符，按值获取其左侧。哦，不要通过右值引用返回任何东西，那是有毒的。

friend path_basic_string
    operator +(
        path_basic_string l,
        base_type const& r)
{
  base_type& l_str = l;
  if (!r.empty())
    l = path_basic_string( std::move(l_str) + "/" + r );
  return l;
}

并消除所有噪音。

接下来，从 base_type 继承 ctors。

最后，使用 += 实现追加并使操作对称:

template <class t_elem, class t_traits, class t_alloc>
class path_basic_string : public std::basic_string<t_elem, t_traits, t_alloc>
{
public:
    using base_type = std::basic_string<t_elem, t_traits, t_alloc>;

    path_basic_string() = default;
    path_basic_string(const path_basic_string & ) = default;
    path_basic_string & operator =(const path_basic_string &) = default;

    using base_type::base_type;

    explicit path_basic_string(base_type r) :
        base_type(std::move(r))
    {
    }
    path_basic_string& operator+= ( base_type const& rhs ) & {
      if (!rhs.empty())
      {
        base_type& self = *this;
        self += '/';
        self += rhs;
      }
      return *this;
    }
    friend path_basic_string operator+(
            base_type l,
            base_type const& r
    )
    {
      path_basic_string l_path(std::move(l));
      l+=r;
      return l;
    }
};

operator+ 这里很奇特，因为它只能通过 ADL 找到，但它实际上在类的 base 类型上运行。

这意味着至少有一个参数必须是该类型的实例(或具有该类型的实例作为模板参数)才能找到它。

如果需要，然后转换为基础。

我按值使用 LHS，因为移动一个字符串是便宜到免费的，而且我们需要一个字符串来输出。通过按值获取 LHS 并将其缓冲区(移动后)用作返回值，我们得到了高效的链式加法:

a+b+c+d+e

成为

(a+b)+c+d+e

现在 a+b 的返回值(纯右值)然后用作 (a+b)+c 的 lhs 参数。

缓冲区的回收继续；只创建一个缓冲区(从第一个 +)，然后移动、调整大小(希望高效)并重新用于表达式的其余部分。

关于c++ - std::string 类继承和繁琐的 C++ 重载解析，我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53155089/