我有注释
package javaannotationtest;
import java.lang.annotation.*;
@Target({ElementType.METHOD})
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
public @interface CustomAnnotation {
}
这适用于以下类中的 compareTo
package javaannotationtest;
public class Customer implements Comparable<Customer>{
@Override
@CustomAnnotation
public int compareTo(Customer o) {
return 0;
}
}
该类使用 java-7 和 java-8 编译代码给出不同的结果。
Java 7
1.7.0_45 -> public int javaannotationtest.Customer.compareTo(javaannotationtest.Customer)
has annotation of type javaannotationtest.CustomAnnotation
1.7.0_45 -> public int javaannotationtest.Customer.compareTo(java.lang.Object)
has no annotation of type javaannotationtest.CustomAnnotation
请注意,compareTo(Object) 没有注释。
Java 8
1.8.0 -> public int javaannotationtest.Customer.compareTo(javaannotationtest.Customer)
has annotation of type javaannotationtest.CustomAnnotation
1.8.0 -> public int javaannotationtest.Customer.compareTo(java.lang.Object)
has annotation of type javaannotationtest.CustomAnnotation
Java 8 在 compareTo(java.lang.Object) 方法中添加了注解
这是使用 Java 8 编译的版本的 javap 输出(可能不相关,它显示了添加到两种方法的注释)
Classfile /C:/code/java8annoation/out/production/java8annoation/javaannotationtest/Customer.class
Last modified 17 Apr, 2014; size 719 bytes
MD5 checksum 678e0371f5f9ed5666b513c940f365a7
Compiled from "Customer.java"
public class javaannotationtest.Customer extends java.lang.Object implements java.lang.Comparable<javaannotationtest.Customer>
Signature: #20 // Ljava/lang/Object;Ljava/lang/Comparable<Ljavaannotationtest/Customer;>;
SourceFile: "Customer.java"
minor version: 0
major version: 52
flags: ACC_PUBLIC, ACC_SUPER
Constant pool:
#1 = Methodref #4.#23 // java/lang/Object."<init>":()V
#2 = Class #24 // javaannotationtest/Customer
#3 = Methodref #2.#25 // javaannotationtest/Customer.compareTo:(Ljavaannotationtest/Customer;)I
#4 = Class #26 // java/lang/Object
#5 = Class #27 // java/lang/Comparable
#6 = Utf8 <init>
#7 = Utf8 ()V
#8 = Utf8 Code
#9 = Utf8 LineNumberTable
#10 = Utf8 LocalVariableTable
#11 = Utf8 this
#12 = Utf8 Ljavaannotationtest/Customer;
#13 = Utf8 compareTo
#14 = Utf8 (Ljavaannotationtest/Customer;)I
#15 = Utf8 o
#16 = Utf8 RuntimeVisibleAnnotations
#17 = Utf8 Ljavaannotationtest/CustomAnnotation;
#18 = Utf8 (Ljava/lang/Object;)I
#19 = Utf8 Signature
#20 = Utf8 Ljava/lang/Object;Ljava/lang/Comparable<Ljavaannotationtest/Customer;>;
#21 = Utf8 SourceFile
#22 = Utf8 Customer.java
#23 = NameAndType #6:#7 // "<init>":()V
#24 = Utf8 javaannotationtest/Customer
#25 = NameAndType #13:#14 // compareTo:(Ljavaannotationtest/Customer;)I
#26 = Utf8 java/lang/Object
#27 = Utf8 java/lang/Comparable
{
public javaannotationtest.Customer();
descriptor: ()V
flags: ACC_PUBLIC
Code:
stack=1, locals=1, args_size=1
0: aload_0
1: invokespecial #1 // Method java/lang/Object."<init>":()V
4: return
LineNumberTable:
line 3: 0
LocalVariableTable:
Start Length Slot Name Signature
0 5 0 this Ljavaannotationtest/Customer;
public int compareTo(javaannotationtest.Customer);
descriptor: (Ljavaannotationtest/Customer;)I
flags: ACC_PUBLIC
Code:
stack=1, locals=2, args_size=2
0: iconst_0
1: ireturn
LineNumberTable:
line 7: 0
LocalVariableTable:
Start Length Slot Name Signature
0 2 0 this Ljavaannotationtest/Customer;
0 2 1 o Ljavaannotationtest/Customer;
RuntimeVisibleAnnotations:
0: #17()
public int compareTo(java.lang.Object);
descriptor: (Ljava/lang/Object;)I
flags: ACC_PUBLIC, ACC_BRIDGE, ACC_SYNTHETIC
Code:
stack=2, locals=2, args_size=2
0: aload_0
1: aload_1
2: checkcast #2 // class javaannotationtest/Customer
5: invokevirtual #3 // Method compareTo:(Ljavaannotationtest/Customer;)I
8: ireturn
LineNumberTable:
line 3: 0
LocalVariableTable:
Start Length Slot Name Signature
0 9 0 this Ljavaannotationtest/Customer;
RuntimeVisibleAnnotations:
0: #17()
}
有人可以解释一下 Java 8 中的相关变化吗? (将在符合条件时提供赏金)。
最佳答案
此更改在问题 JDK-6695379 - Copy method annotations and parameter annotations to synthetic bridge methods 中进行了描述.似乎没有太多关于此功能的讨论,但请求和理由对我来说确实有意义。
A DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST : When a class extends a generic classes or implements a generic interface, synthetic method may be generated to bridge between the method taking specific parameters/return and the one of the super-class/interface which is defined with Objects, because of erasure. A bridge method redirects the call to the actual method, according to Java Language Specification. However the bridge method lacks the annotations defined for the original method and its parameters.
JUSTIFICATION : The problem arises when trying to retrieve annotations of such a method at run-time. Since it's impossible to find out reliably what classes substitute the generic parameters, we don't know what parameter to send to getMethod(...) in order to receive the correct method back. When sending Object.class (while generic parameter is a different class) getMethod will return the bridge method, which won't have the information about the original method annotations.
它也记录在 JDK 8 compatibility guide 中:
Area: Tools / javac
Synopsis
As of this release, parameter and method annotations are copied to synthetic bridge methods.This fix implies that now for programs like:@Target(value = {ElementType.PARAMETER}) @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) @interface ParamAnnotation {} @Target(value = {ElementType.METHOD}) @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) @interface MethodAnnotation {} abstract class T<A,B> { B m(A a){return null;} } class CovariantReturnType extends T<Integer, Integer> { @MethodAnnotation Integer m(@ParamAnnotation Integer i) { return i; } public class VisibilityChange extends CovariantReturnType {} }Each generated bridge method will have all the annotations of the method it redirects to. Parameter annotations will also be copied. This change in the behavior may impact some annotations processor or in general any application that use the annotations.
Nature of Incompatibility
behavioralRFE
6695379
关于java 8 - Icomparable<T> 的注释 compareTo <T> 也添加了注释 compareTo(Object o),我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23128335/
我有一个对象has_many应呈现为xml的子对象。这不是问题。我的问题是我创建了一个Hash包含此数据,就像解析器需要它一样。但是rails自动将整个文件包含在.........我需要摆脱type="array"和我该如何处理?我没有在文档中找到任何内容。 最佳答案 我遇到了同样的问题;这是我的XML:我在用这个:entries.to_xml将散列数据转换为XML,但这会将条目的数据包装到中所以我修改了:entries.to_xml(root:"Contacts")但这仍然将转换后的XML包装在“联系人”中,将我的XML代码修改为
我真的很习惯使用Ruby编写以下代码:my_hash={}my_hash['test']=1Java中对应的数据结构是什么? 最佳答案 HashMapmap=newHashMap();map.put("test",1);我假设? 关于java-等价于Java中的RubyHash,我们在StackOverflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22737685/
关闭。这个问题需要detailsorclarity.它目前不接受答案。想改进这个问题吗?通过editingthispost添加细节并澄清问题.关闭8年前。Improvethisquestion在首页我有:汽车:VolvoSaabMercedesAudistatic_pages_spec.rb中的测试代码:it"shouldhavetherightselect"dovisithome_pathit{shouldhave_select('cars',:options=>['volvo','saab','mercedes','audi'])}end响应是rspec./spec/request
我使用Nokogiri(Rubygem)css搜索寻找某些在我的html里面。看起来Nokogiri的css搜索不喜欢正则表达式。我想切换到Nokogiri的xpath搜索,因为这似乎支持搜索字符串中的正则表达式。如何在xpath搜索中实现下面提到的(伪)css搜索?require'rubygems'require'nokogiri'value=Nokogiri::HTML.parse(ABBlaCD3"HTML_END#my_blockisgivenmy_bl="1"#my_eqcorrespondstothisregexmy_eq="\/[0-9]+\/"#FIXMEThefoll
我正在尝试使用boilerpipe来自JRuby。我看过guide从JRuby调用Java,并成功地将它与另一个Java包一起使用,但无法弄清楚为什么同样的东西不能用于boilerpipe。我正在尝试基本上从JRuby中执行与此Java等效的操作:URLurl=newURL("http://www.example.com/some-location/index.html");Stringtext=ArticleExtractor.INSTANCE.getText(url);在JRuby中试过这个:require'java'url=java.net.URL.new("http://www
我只想对我一直在思考的这个问题有其他意见,例如我有classuser_controller和classuserclassUserattr_accessor:name,:usernameendclassUserController//dosomethingaboutanythingaboutusersend问题是我的User类中是否应该有逻辑user=User.newuser.do_something(user1)oritshouldbeuser_controller=UserController.newuser_controller.do_something(user1,user2)我
什么是ruby的rack或python的Java的wsgi?还有一个路由库。 最佳答案 来自Python标准PEP333:Bycontrast,althoughJavahasjustasmanywebapplicationframeworksavailable,Java's"servlet"APImakesitpossibleforapplicationswrittenwithanyJavawebapplicationframeworktoruninanywebserverthatsupportstheservletAPI.ht
这篇文章是继上一篇文章“Observability:从零开始创建Java微服务并监控它(一)”的续篇。在上一篇文章中,我们讲述了如何创建一个Javaweb应用,并使用Filebeat来收集应用所生成的日志。在今天的文章中,我来详述如何收集应用的指标,使用APM来监控应用并监督web服务的在线情况。源码可以在地址 https://github.com/liu-xiao-guo/java_observability 进行下载。摄入指标指标被视为可以随时更改的时间点值。当前请求的数量可以改变任何毫秒。你可能有1000个请求的峰值,然后一切都回到一个请求。这也意味着这些指标可能不准确,你还想提取最小/
HashMap中为什么引入红黑树,而不是AVL树呢1.概述开始学习这个知识点之前我们需要知道,在JDK1.8以及之前,针对HashMap有什么不同。JDK1.7的时候,HashMap的底层实现是数组+链表JDK1.8的时候,HashMap的底层实现是数组+链表+红黑树我们要思考一个问题,为什么要从链表转为红黑树呢。首先先让我们了解下链表有什么不好???2.链表上述的截图其实就是链表的结构,我们来看下链表的增删改查的时间复杂度增:因为链表不是线性结构,所以每次添加的时候,只需要移动一个节点,所以可以理解为复杂度是N(1)删:算法时间复杂度跟增保持一致查:既然是非线性结构,所以查询某一个节点的时候
遍历文件夹我们通常是使用递归进行操作,这种方式比较简单,也比较容易理解。本文为大家介绍另一种不使用递归的方式,由于没有使用递归,只用到了循环和集合,所以效率更高一些!一、使用递归遍历文件夹整体思路1、使用File封装初始目录,2、打印这个目录3、获取这个目录下所有的子文件和子目录的数组。4、遍历这个数组,取出每个File对象4-1、如果File是否是一个文件,打印4-2、否则就是一个目录,递归调用代码实现publicclassSearchFile{publicstaticvoidmain(String[]args){//初始目录Filedir=newFile("d:/Dev");Datebeg