C++引用页列出了global new operators的8种特定于类的重载。其中有四个是为2017版的C++添加的。

类特定的分配函数

void* T::operator new  ( std::size_t count );   
void* T::operator new[]( std::size_t count );
void* T::operator new  ( std::size_t count, std::align_val_t al ); // (since C++17)
void* T::operator new[]( std::size_t count, std::align_val_t al ); // (since C++17)

void* T::operator new  ( std::size_t count, user-defined-args... );
void* T::operator new[]( std::size_t count, user-defined-args... );
void* T::operator new  ( std::size_t count,
    std::align_val_t al, user-defined-args... ); // (since C++17)
void* T::operator new[]( std::size_t count,
     std::align_val_t al, user-defined-args... ); // (since C++17)

void T::operator delete  ( void* ptr );
void T::operator delete[]( void* ptr );
void T::operator delete  ( void* ptr, std::align_val_t al ); // (since C++17)
void T::operator delete[]( void* ptr, std::align_val_t al ); // (since C++17)
void T::operator delete  ( void* ptr, std::size_t sz );
void T::operator delete[]( void* ptr, std::size_t sz );
void T::operator delete  ( void* ptr, std::size_t sz, std::align_val_t al ); // (since C++17)
void T::operator delete[]( void* ptr, std::size_t sz, std::align_val_t al ); // (since C++17)

void T::operator delete  ( void* ptr, args... );
void T::operator delete[]( void* ptr, args... );

最佳答案

不，您不需要为您的类编写new和delete运算符的所有变体。

有多个原因会偏爱某些新版本而不是其他版本。我将分别描述每个原因。

几乎总是喜欢具有size参数的删除运算符，而不是那些没有参数的删除运算符。

当我为可为其他类提供内存处理的基类编写删除运算符时，我会使用这些版本的删除运算符

void T::operator delete  ( void* ptr, std::size_t sz );
void T::operator delete[]( void* ptr, std::size_t sz );
void T::operator delete  ( void* ptr, std::size_t sz, std::align_val_t al ); // (since C++17)
void T::operator delete[]( void* ptr, std::size_t sz, std::align_val_t al ); // (since C++17)

void T::operator delete  ( void* ptr );
void T::operator delete[]( void* ptr );
void T::operator delete  ( void* ptr, std::align_val_t al ); // (since C++17)
void T::operator delete[]( void* ptr, std::align_val_t al ); // (since C++17)

When allocating objects and arrays of objects whose alignment exceeds STDCPP_DEFAULT_NEW_ALIGNMENT, overload resolution is performed twice: first, for alignment-aware function signatures, then for alignment-unaware function signatures. This means that if a class with extended alignment has an alignment-unaware class-specific allocation function, it is the function that will be called, not the global alignment-aware allocation function. This is intentional: the class member is expected to know best how to handle that class.

void* T::operator new  ( std::size_t count, std::align_val_t al ); // (since C++17)
void* T::operator new[]( std::size_t count, std::align_val_t al ); // (since C++17)
void* T::operator new  ( std::size_t count,
    std::align_val_t al, user-defined-args... ); // (since C++17)
void* T::operator new[]( std::size_t count,
     std::align_val_t al, user-defined-args... ); // (since C++17)

void* T::operator new  ( std::size_t count );
void* T::operator new[]( std::size_t count );

void* T::operator new  ( std::size_t count, user-defined-args... );
void* T::operator new[]( std::size_t count, user-defined-args... );

void* T::operator new  ( std::size_t count, user-defined-args... );
void* T::operator new[]( std::size_t count, user-defined-args... );
void* T::operator new  ( std::size_t count,
    std::align_val_t al, user-defined-args... ); // (since C++17)
void* T::operator new[]( std::size_t count,
     std::align_val_t al, user-defined-args... ); // (since C++17)

void* T::operator new  ( std::size_t count, void* hint );
void* T::operator new[]( std::size_t count, void* hint );
void* T::operator new  ( std::size_t count, std::align_val_t al, void* hint ); // (since C++17)
void* T::operator new[]( std::size_t count, std::align_val_t al, void* hint ); // (since C++17)

class Foo : public MemoryHandler
{
public:
    Foo();
    ...
private:
    Blah * b_;
    Wham * f_;
};

Foo::Foo() : b_( nullptr ), f_( nullptr )
{
    // This should put data members on the same memory page as this Foo object.
    b_ = new ( this ) Blah;
    f_ = new ( this ) Wham;
}

关于c++ - 如果我为一个类写new和delete运算符，我是否必须写所有它们的重载？，我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45536408/