我有一个看起来像这样的函数 -

std::string func()
{
    std::string result;

    ...

    auto seed = std::random_device()();
    std::mt19937 gen(seed);
    std::uniform_int_distribution<> dis(0, 61);

    ...
    return result;
}

它可以在各种编译器及其版本中正常编译，但仍无法通过 Ubuntu 上的 valgrind 测试。我明确提到了 ubuntu，因为它在我安装了 Arch Linux 的机器上成功通过。

两个 valgrind 安装报告它们的版本为 valgrind-3.11.0 唯一的区别是 Arch Linux 安装在我的机器上没有虚拟化，而 Ubuntu 测试是在 DO/CI 服务器上完成的可能处于某种虚拟化状态。但这有关系吗？

这是 valgrind 运行的日志 -

 --- stderr ---
==13849== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==13849== Copyright (C) 2002-2015, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==13849== Using Valgrind-3.11.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==13849== Command: file/path/here
==13849== 
vex amd64->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0xF 0xC7 0xF0 0x89 0x6 0xF 0x42 0xC1
vex amd64->IR:   REX=0 REX.W=0 REX.R=0 REX.X=0 REX.B=0
vex amd64->IR:   VEX=0 VEX.L=0 VEX.nVVVV=0x0 ESC=0F
vex amd64->IR:   PFX.66=0 PFX.F2=0 PFX.F3=0
==13849== valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x5111715.
==13849==    at 0x5111715: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.22)
==13849==    by 0x51118B1: std::random_device::_M_getval() (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.22)
==13849==    by 0x4809FB: std::random_device::operator()() (random.h:1612)
==13849==    by 0x47F0C2: isaac::deviceList::genId[abi:cxx11](unsigned int) (deviceList.cpp:21)
==13849==    by 0x47F2A7: isaac::deviceList::place(isaac::deviceType, nlohmann::basic_json<std::map, std::vector, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, bool, long, unsigned long, double, std::allocator>) (deviceList.cpp:38)
==13849==    by 0x40D06E: DeviceList_place_Test::TestBody() (test.cpp:194)
==13849==    by 0x45D5A7: void testing::internal::HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void>(testing::Test*, void (testing::Test::*)(), char const*) (gtest.cc:2078)
==13849==    by 0x4588D2: void testing::internal::HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void>(testing::Test*, void (testing::Test::*)(), char const*) (gtest.cc:2114)
==13849==    by 0x43EBB3: testing::Test::Run() (gtest.cc:2151)
==13849==    by 0x43F3F5: testing::TestInfo::Run() (gtest.cc:2326)
==13849==    by 0x43FA52: testing::TestCase::Run() (gtest.cc:2444)
==13849==    by 0x446911: testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() (gtest.cc:4315)
==13849== Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
==13849== did not recognise.  There are two possible reasons for this.
==13849== 1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
==13849==    location.  If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
==13849==    warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
==13849== 2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
==13849==    i.e. it's Valgrind's fault.  If you think this is the case or
==13849==    you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
==13849== Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
==13849== probably kill your program.
==13849== 
==13849== Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL): dumping core
==13849==  Illegal opcode at address 0x5111715
==13849==    at 0x5111715: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.22)
==13849==    by 0x51118B1: std::random_device::_M_getval() (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6.0.22)
==13849==    by 0x4809FB: std::random_device::operator()() (random.h:1612)
==13849==    by 0x47F0C2: isaac::deviceList::genId[abi:cxx11](unsigned int) (deviceList.cpp:21)
==13849==    by 0x47F2A7: isaac::deviceList::place(isaac::deviceType, nlohmann::basic_json<std::map, std::vector, std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, bool, long, unsigned long, double, std::allocator>) (deviceList.cpp:38)
==13849==    by 0x40D06E: DeviceList_place_Test::TestBody() (test.cpp:194)
==13849==    by 0x45D5A7: void testing::internal::HandleSehExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void>(testing::Test*, void (testing::Test::*)(), char const*) (gtest.cc:2078)
==13849==    by 0x4588D2: void testing::internal::HandleExceptionsInMethodIfSupported<testing::Test, void>(testing::Test*, void (testing::Test::*)(), char const*) (gtest.cc:2114)
==13849==    by 0x43EBB3: testing::Test::Run() (gtest.cc:2151)
==13849==    by 0x43F3F5: testing::TestInfo::Run() (gtest.cc:2326)
==13849==    by 0x43FA52: testing::TestCase::Run() (gtest.cc:2444)
==13849==    by 0x446911: testing::internal::UnitTestImpl::RunAllTests() (gtest.cc:4315)
==13849== 
==13849== HEAP SUMMARY:
==13849==     in use at exit: 84,300 bytes in 108 blocks
==13849==   total heap usage: 622 allocs, 514 frees, 530,112 bytes allocated
==13849== 
==13849== LEAK SUMMARY:
==13849==    definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==13849==    indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==13849==      possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==13849==    still reachable: 84,300 bytes in 108 blocks
==13849==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==13849== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
==13849== 
==13849== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==13849== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
-------

编辑 - 我也尝试过从官方来源手动构建 valgrind 并安装它，但仍然会产生相同的错误。

最佳答案

参见 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353370 .

获取/编译最新的 svn 版本应该可以解决这个问题。

如果没有，请在 bugzilla 上报告，因为 3.12 版本即将发布。 谢谢

关于c++ - valgrind:地址 0x5111715 处无法识别的指令，我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/39673469/