我正在尝试使用 boost spirit 为以下 BNF 规则编写解析器
(Boost v1.64)
规则是:
<numeric-literal>::= integer
<type-name> ::= "in" | "out" | "in_out"
<array-type-spec> ::= <type-spec> "[" [<numeric-literal>] "]"
<tuple-type-spec> ::= "(" <type-spec> ("," <type-spec>)+ ")"
<type-spec> ::= <type-name> | <array-type-spec> | <tuple-type-spec>
下面是我的尝试,使用 boost::make_recursive_variant
它似乎在字符串 in
上工作正常
但它在 in[2] 上失败了。
我的错误在哪里?
什么是优雅的解决方案?
namespace Ast {
enum class TypeName { IN, OUT, INOUT};
using NumericLiteral = int;
using TypeSpec = boost::make_recursive_variant
<
TypeName,
std::pair<boost::recursive_variant_, NumericLiteral>,
std::vector < boost::recursive_variant_ >
>::type;
}
//grammar:
namespace myGrammar {
namespace qi = boost::spirit::qi;
template <typename Iterator = char const*,typename Signature = Ast::TypeSpec()>
struct myRules : qi::grammar < Iterator, Signature> {
myRules() : myRules::base_type(start) {
fillSymbols();
rNumericLiteral = qi::int_;
rTypeName = sTypeName;
rTypeSpec = rTypeName | (rTypeSpec >> '[' >> rNumericLiteral >> ']') | ('(' >> qi::repeat(2, qi::inf)[(rTypeSpec % ',')] >> ')');
start = qi::skip(qi::space)[rTypeSpec];
}
private:
using Skipper = qi::space_type;
qi::rule<Iterator, Ast::TypeSpec()> start;
qi::rule<Iterator, Ast::NumericLiteral(), Skipper> rNumericLiteral;
qi::rule<Iterator, Ast::TypeName(), Skipper> rTypeName;
qi::rule<Iterator, Ast::TypeSpec(), Skipper> rTypeSpec;
//symbols
qi::symbols<char, Ast::TypeName>sTypeName;
void fillSymbols()
{
using namespace Ast;
sTypeName.add
("in", TypeName::IN)
("out", TypeName::OUT)
("in_out", TypeName::INOUT)
}
};
}
最佳答案
将此语法 1:1 转换为 PEG 语法时出现问题,因为左递归会导致无限递归。
您仍然可以简单地重新排列规则,这样就不会发生左递归,但是您在合成所需的 AST 时会遇到更多麻烦。
这里有一个半途而废的测试结果:
//#define BOOST_SPIRIT_DEBUG
#include <boost/spirit/include/qi.hpp>
#include <boost/fusion/adapted/std_pair.hpp>
/*
<numeric-literal> ::= integer
<type-name> ::= "in" | "out" | "in_out"
<array-type-spec> ::= <type-spec> "[" [<numeric-literal>] "]"
<tuple-type-spec> ::= "(" <type-spec> ("," <type-spec>)+ ")"
<type-spec> ::= <type-name> | <array-type-spec> | <tuple-type-spec>
*/
namespace Ast {
enum class TypeName { IN, OUT, INOUT };
static inline std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& os, TypeName tn) {
switch(tn) {
case TypeName::IN: return os << "IN";
case TypeName::OUT: return os << "OUT";
case TypeName::INOUT: return os << "INOUT";
}
return os << "?";
}
using NumericLiteral = int;
using TypeSpec = boost::make_recursive_variant<
TypeName,
std::pair<boost::recursive_variant_, NumericLiteral>,
std::vector<boost::recursive_variant_>
>::type;
using ArraySpec = std::pair<TypeSpec, NumericLiteral>;
using TupleSpec = std::vector<TypeSpec>;
}
// grammar:
namespace myGrammar {
namespace qi = boost::spirit::qi;
template <typename Iterator = char const *, typename Signature = Ast::TypeSpec()>
struct myRules : qi::grammar<Iterator, Signature> {
myRules() : myRules::base_type(start) {
rNumericLiteral = qi::int_;
rTypeName = sTypeName >> !qi::alpha;
rTupleSpec = '(' >> rTypeSpec >> +(',' >> rTypeSpec) >> ')';
rScalarSpec = rTypeName | rTupleSpec;
rArraySpec = rScalarSpec >> '[' >> rNumericLiteral >> ']';
rTypeSpec = rArraySpec | rScalarSpec;
start = qi::skip(qi::space)[rTypeSpec >> qi::eoi];
BOOST_SPIRIT_DEBUG_NODES((start)(rTypeSpec)(rTypeName)(rArraySpec)(rScalarSpec)(rTypeSpec)(rNumericLiteral))
}
private:
using Skipper = qi::space_type;
qi::rule<Iterator, Ast::TypeSpec()> start;
qi::rule<Iterator, Ast::NumericLiteral(), Skipper> rNumericLiteral;
qi::rule<Iterator, Ast::ArraySpec(), Skipper> rArraySpec;
qi::rule<Iterator, Ast::TypeSpec(), Skipper> rTypeSpec, rScalarSpec;
qi::rule<Iterator, Ast::TupleSpec(), Skipper> rTupleSpec;
// implicit lexeme
qi::rule<Iterator, Ast::TypeName()> rTypeName;
// symbols
struct TypeName_r : qi::symbols<char, Ast::TypeName> {
TypeName_r() {
using Ast::TypeName;
add ("in", TypeName::IN)
("out", TypeName::OUT)
("in_out", TypeName::INOUT);
}
} sTypeName;
};
}
static inline std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& os, Ast::TypeSpec tn) {
struct {
std::ostream& _os;
void operator()(Ast::TypeSpec const& ts) const {
apply_visitor(*this, ts);
}
void operator()(Ast::TypeName tn) const { std::cout << tn; }
void operator()(Ast::TupleSpec const& tss) const {
std::cout << "(";
for (auto const& ts: tss) {
(*this)(ts);
std::cout << ", ";
}
std::cout << ")";
}
void operator()(Ast::ArraySpec const& as) const {
(*this)(as.first);
std::cout << '[' << as.second << ']';
}
} const dumper{os};
dumper(tn);
return os;
}
int main() {
using It = std::string::const_iterator;
myGrammar::myRules<It> const parser;
std::string const test_ok[] = {
"in",
"out",
"in_out",
"(in, out)",
"(out, in)",
"(in, in, in, out, in_out)",
"in[13]",
"in[0]",
"in[-2]",
"in[1][2][3]",
"in[3][3][3]",
"(in[3][3][3], out, in_out[0])",
"(in[3][3][3], out, in_out[0])",
"(in, out)[13]",
"(in, out)[13][0]",
};
std::string const test_fail[] = {
"",
"i n",
"inout",
"()",
"(in)",
"(out)",
"(in_out)",
"IN",
};
auto expect = [&](std::string const& sample, bool expected) {
It f = sample.begin(), l = sample.end();
Ast::TypeSpec spec;
bool ok = parse(f, l, parser, spec);
std::cout << "Test passed:" << std::boolalpha << (expected == ok) << "\n";
if (expected || (expected != ok)) {
if (ok) {
std::cout << "Parsed: " << spec << "\n";
} else {
std::cout << "Parse failed\n";
}
}
if (f!=l) {
std::cout << "Remaining unparsed: '" << std::string(f,l) << "'\n";
}
};
for (std::string const sample : test_ok) expect(sample, true);
for (std::string const sample : test_fail) expect(sample, false);
}
打印
Test passed:true
Parsed: IN
Test passed:true
Parsed: OUT
Test passed:true
Parsed: INOUT
Test passed:true
Parsed: (IN, OUT, )
Test passed:true
Parsed: (OUT, IN, )
Test passed:true
Parsed: (IN, IN, IN, OUT, INOUT, )
Test passed:true
Parsed: IN[13]
Test passed:true
Parsed: IN[0]
Test passed:true
Parsed: IN[-2]
Test passed:false
Parse failed
Remaining unparsed: 'in[1][2][3]'
Test passed:false
Parse failed
Remaining unparsed: 'in[3][3][3]'
Test passed:false
Parse failed
Remaining unparsed: '(in[3][3][3], out, in_out[0])'
Test passed:false
Parse failed
Remaining unparsed: '(in[3][3][3], out, in_out[0])'
Test passed:true
Parsed: (IN, OUT, )[13]
Test passed:false
Parse failed
Remaining unparsed: '(in, out)[13][0]'
Test passed:true
Test passed:true
Remaining unparsed: 'i n'
Test passed:true
Remaining unparsed: 'inout'
Test passed:true
Remaining unparsed: '()'
Test passed:true
Remaining unparsed: '(in)'
Test passed:true
Remaining unparsed: '(out)'
Test passed:true
Remaining unparsed: '(in_out)'
Test passed:true
Remaining unparsed: 'IN'
如您所见,除了像 in[1][2] 这样的链式数组维度,大多数内容都得到了正确的解析。问题是我们通过在规则中引入“优先级”来解决歧义:
rScalarSpec = rTypeName | rTupleSpec;
rArraySpec = rScalarSpec >> '[' >> rNumericLiteral >> ']';
rTypeSpec = rArraySpec | rScalarSpec;
这意味着我们总是首先尝试期望一个数组维度,只有在找不到数组维度时才回退到标量类型规范。这是因为任何数组规范总是首先作为标量规范进行匹配,从而无法解析数组维度部分。
要修复多维情况,您可以尝试断言 [ 不遵循数组规范:
rArraySpec = rScalarSpec >> '[' >> rNumericLiteral >> ']' >> !qi::lit('[')
| rArraySpec >> '[' >> rNumericLiteral >> ']';
但是——砰——我们又回到了左递归(以防我们进入第二个分支,例如in[1][)。
两个念头闪过我的脑海。
我想说,在 AST 中消除标量/数组规范之间的区别会非常有益。如果将标量视为零阶数组,这意味着我们始终可以将可选维度解析为相同的结果 AST 类型。
另一个想法或多或少地沿着上面显示的道路继续前进,并且如果假定的标量规范后跟“[”字符,则需要一直回溯下去。在 (very long spec)[1][1][1][1][1][1][1][1][1][1].
让我实现茶歇后概述的第一个想法 :)
这里的 TypeSpec 总是带有一个(可能是空的)维度集合:
namespace Ast {
enum class TypeName { IN, OUT, INOUT };
static inline std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& os, TypeName tn) {
switch(tn) {
case TypeName::IN: return os << "IN";
case TypeName::OUT: return os << "OUT";
case TypeName::INOUT: return os << "INOUT";
}
return os << "?";
}
struct TypeSpec;
using ScalarSpec = boost::make_recursive_variant<
TypeName,
std::vector<TypeSpec>
>::type;
struct TypeSpec {
ScalarSpec spec;
std::vector<unsigned> dim;
};
using TupleSpec = std::vector<TypeSpec>;
}
请注意,我们还通过使维度无符号来进行改进。语法将检查它是否不是 0 以确保完整性。由于这个原因,许多“正面”测试用例已移至“预期失败”用例。
现在语法是对它的直接模仿:
rRank %= qi::uint_ [qi::_pass = (qi::_1 > 0)];
rTypeName = sTypeName;
rTupleSpec = '(' >> rTypeSpec >> +(',' >> rTypeSpec) >> ')';
rScalarSpec = rTypeName | rTupleSpec;
rTypeSpec = rScalarSpec >> *('[' >> rRank >> ']');
Note the semantic action using Phoenix to assert that the array dimension cannot be 0
这是显示所有测试用例通过的现场演示:
//#define BOOST_SPIRIT_DEBUG
#include <boost/spirit/include/qi.hpp>
#include <boost/spirit/include/phoenix.hpp>
#include <boost/fusion/adapted.hpp>
/*
<numeric-literal> ::= integer
<type-name> ::= "in" | "out" | "in_out"
<array-type-spec> ::= <type-spec> "[" [<numeric-literal>] "]"
<tuple-type-spec> ::= "(" <type-spec> ("," <type-spec>)+ ")"
<type-spec> ::= <type-name> | <array-type-spec> | <tuple-type-spec>
*/
namespace Ast {
enum class TypeName { IN, OUT, INOUT };
static inline std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& os, TypeName tn) {
switch(tn) {
case TypeName::IN: return os << "IN";
case TypeName::OUT: return os << "OUT";
case TypeName::INOUT: return os << "INOUT";
}
return os << "?";
}
struct TypeSpec;
using ScalarSpec = boost::make_recursive_variant<
TypeName,
std::vector<TypeSpec>
>::type;
struct TypeSpec {
ScalarSpec spec;
std::vector<unsigned> dim;
};
using TupleSpec = std::vector<TypeSpec>;
}
BOOST_FUSION_ADAPT_STRUCT(Ast::TypeSpec, spec, dim)
// grammar:
namespace myGrammar {
namespace qi = boost::spirit::qi;
template <typename Iterator = char const *, typename Signature = Ast::TypeSpec()>
struct myRules : qi::grammar<Iterator, Signature> {
myRules() : myRules::base_type(start) {
rRank %= qi::uint_ [qi::_pass = (qi::_1 > 0)];
rTypeName = sTypeName;
rTupleSpec = '(' >> rTypeSpec >> +(',' >> rTypeSpec) >> ')';
rScalarSpec = rTypeName | rTupleSpec;
rTypeSpec = rScalarSpec >> *('[' >> rRank >> ']');
start = qi::skip(qi::space)[rTypeSpec >> qi::eoi];
BOOST_SPIRIT_DEBUG_NODES((start)(rTypeSpec)(rTypeName)(rScalarSpec)(rTypeSpec)(rRank))
}
private:
using Skipper = qi::space_type;
qi::rule<Iterator, Ast::TypeSpec()> start;
qi::rule<Iterator, Ast::ScalarSpec(), Skipper> rScalarSpec;
qi::rule<Iterator, Ast::TypeSpec(), Skipper> rTypeSpec;
qi::rule<Iterator, Ast::TupleSpec(), Skipper> rTupleSpec;
// implicit lexeme
qi::rule<Iterator, Ast::TypeName()> rTypeName;
qi::rule<Iterator, unsigned()> rRank;
// symbols
struct TypeName_r : qi::symbols<char, Ast::TypeName> {
TypeName_r() {
using Ast::TypeName;
add ("in", TypeName::IN)
("out", TypeName::OUT)
("in_out", TypeName::INOUT);
}
} sTypeName;
};
}
static inline std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& os, Ast::TypeSpec tn) {
struct {
std::ostream& _os;
void operator()(Ast::ScalarSpec const& ts) const {
apply_visitor(*this, ts);
}
void operator()(Ast::TypeName tn) const { std::cout << tn; }
void operator()(Ast::TupleSpec const& tss) const {
std::cout << "(";
for (auto const& ts: tss) {
(*this)(ts);
std::cout << ", ";
}
std::cout << ")";
}
void operator()(Ast::TypeSpec const& as) const {
(*this)(as.spec);
for (auto rank : as.dim)
std::cout << '[' << rank << ']';
}
} const dumper{os};
dumper(tn);
return os;
}
int main() {
using It = std::string::const_iterator;
myGrammar::myRules<It> const parser;
std::string const test_ok[] = {
"in",
"out",
"in_out",
"(in, out)",
"(out, in)",
"(in, in, in, out, in_out)",
"in[13]",
"in[1][2][3]",
"in[3][3][3]",
"(in[3][3][3], out, in_out[1])",
"(in[3][3][3], out, in_out[1])",
"(in, out)[13]",
"(in, out)[13][14]",
};
std::string const test_fail[] = {
"",
"i n",
"inout",
"()",
"(in)",
"(out)",
"(in_out)",
"IN",
"in[0]",
"in[-2]",
"(in[3][3][3], out, in_out[0])",
"(in[3][3][3], out, in_out[0])",
};
auto expect = [&](std::string const& sample, bool expected) {
It f = sample.begin(), l = sample.end();
Ast::TypeSpec spec;
bool ok = parse(f, l, parser, spec);
std::cout << "Test passed:" << std::boolalpha << (expected == ok) << "\n";
if (expected || (expected != ok)) {
if (ok) {
std::cout << "Parsed: " << spec << "\n";
} else {
std::cout << "Parse failed\n";
}
}
if (f!=l) {
std::cout << "Remaining unparsed: '" << std::string(f,l) << "'\n";
}
};
for (std::string const sample : test_ok) expect(sample, true);
for (std::string const sample : test_fail) expect(sample, false);
}
打印
Test passed:true
Parsed: IN
Test passed:true
Parsed: OUT
Test passed:true
Parsed: INOUT
Test passed:true
Parsed: (IN, OUT, )
Test passed:true
Parsed: (OUT, IN, )
Test passed:true
Parsed: (IN, IN, IN, OUT, INOUT, )
Test passed:true
Parsed: IN[13]
Test passed:true
Parsed: IN[1][2][3]
Test passed:true
Parsed: IN[3][3][3]
Test passed:true
Parsed: (IN[3][3][3], OUT, INOUT[1], )
Test passed:true
Parsed: (IN[3][3][3], OUT, INOUT[1], )
Test passed:true
Parsed: (IN, OUT, )[13]
Test passed:true
Parsed: (IN, OUT, )[13][14]
Test passed:true
Test passed:true
Remaining unparsed: 'i n'
Test passed:true
Remaining unparsed: 'inout'
Test passed:true
Remaining unparsed: '()'
Test passed:true
Remaining unparsed: '(in)'
Test passed:true
Remaining unparsed: '(out)'
Test passed:true
Remaining unparsed: '(in_out)'
Test passed:true
Remaining unparsed: 'IN'
Test passed:true
Remaining unparsed: 'in[0]'
Test passed:true
Remaining unparsed: 'in[-2]'
Test passed:true
Remaining unparsed: '(in[3][3][3], out, in_out[0])'
Test passed:true
Remaining unparsed: '(in[3][3][3], out, in_out[0])'
关于c++ - 使用 boost spirit 的递归 BNF 规则,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45220323/
我正在学习如何使用Nokogiri,根据这段代码我遇到了一些问题:require'rubygems'require'mechanize'post_agent=WWW::Mechanize.newpost_page=post_agent.get('http://www.vbulletin.org/forum/showthread.php?t=230708')puts"\nabsolutepathwithtbodygivesnil"putspost_page.parser.xpath('/html/body/div/div/div/div/div/table/tbody/tr/td/div
我有一个Ruby程序,它使用rubyzip压缩XML文件的目录树。gem。我的问题是文件开始变得很重,我想提高压缩级别,因为压缩时间不是问题。我在rubyzipdocumentation中找不到一种为创建的ZIP文件指定压缩级别的方法。有人知道如何更改此设置吗?是否有另一个允许指定压缩级别的Ruby库? 最佳答案 这是我通过查看rubyzip内部创建的代码。level=Zlib::BEST_COMPRESSIONZip::ZipOutputStream.open(zip_file)do|zip|Dir.glob("**/*")d
类classAprivatedeffooputs:fooendpublicdefbarputs:barendprivatedefzimputs:zimendprotecteddefdibputs:dibendendA的实例a=A.new测试a.foorescueputs:faila.barrescueputs:faila.zimrescueputs:faila.dibrescueputs:faila.gazrescueputs:fail测试输出failbarfailfailfail.发送测试[:foo,:bar,:zim,:dib,:gaz].each{|m|a.send(m)resc
很好奇,就使用rubyonrails自动化单元测试而言,你们正在做什么?您是否创建了一个脚本来在cron中运行rake作业并将结果邮寄给您?git中的预提交Hook?只是手动调用?我完全理解测试,但想知道在错误发生之前捕获错误的最佳实践是什么。让我们理所当然地认为测试本身是完美无缺的,并且可以正常工作。下一步是什么以确保他们在正确的时间将可能有害的结果传达给您? 最佳答案 不确定您到底想听什么,但是有几个级别的自动代码库控制:在处理某项功能时,您可以使用类似autotest的内容获得关于哪些有效,哪些无效的即时反馈。要确保您的提
假设我做了一个模块如下:m=Module.newdoclassCendend三个问题:除了对m的引用之外,还有什么方法可以访问C和m中的其他内容?我可以在创建匿名模块后为其命名吗(就像我输入“module...”一样)?如何在使用完匿名模块后将其删除,使其定义的常量不再存在? 最佳答案 三个答案:是的,使用ObjectSpace.此代码使c引用你的类(class)C不引用m:c=nilObjectSpace.each_object{|obj|c=objif(Class===objandobj.name=~/::C$/)}当然这取决于
我正在尝试使用ruby和Savon来使用网络服务。测试服务为http://www.webservicex.net/WS/WSDetails.aspx?WSID=9&CATID=2require'rubygems'require'savon'client=Savon::Client.new"http://www.webservicex.net/stockquote.asmx?WSDL"client.get_quotedo|soap|soap.body={:symbol=>"AAPL"}end返回SOAP异常。检查soap信封,在我看来soap请求没有正确的命名空间。任何人都可以建议我
关闭。这个问题是opinion-based.它目前不接受答案。想要改进这个问题?更新问题,以便editingthispost可以用事实和引用来回答它.关闭4年前。Improvethisquestion我想在固定时间创建一系列低音和高音调的哔哔声。例如:在150毫秒时发出高音调的蜂鸣声在151毫秒时发出低音调的蜂鸣声200毫秒时发出低音调的蜂鸣声250毫秒的高音调蜂鸣声有没有办法在Ruby或Python中做到这一点?我真的不在乎输出编码是什么(.wav、.mp3、.ogg等等),但我确实想创建一个输出文件。
我在我的项目目录中完成了compasscreate.和compassinitrails。几个问题:我已将我的.sass文件放在public/stylesheets中。这是放置它们的正确位置吗?当我运行compasswatch时,它不会自动编译这些.sass文件。我必须手动指定文件:compasswatchpublic/stylesheets/myfile.sass等。如何让它自动运行?文件ie.css、print.css和screen.css已放在stylesheets/compiled。如何在编译后不让它们重新出现的情况下删除它们?我自己编译的.sass文件编译成compiled/t
我想将html转换为纯文本。不过,我不想只删除标签,我想智能地保留尽可能多的格式。为插入换行符标签,检测段落并格式化它们等。输入非常简单,通常是格式良好的html(不是整个文档,只是一堆内容,通常没有anchor或图像)。我可以将几个正则表达式放在一起,让我达到80%,但我认为可能有一些现有的解决方案更智能。 最佳答案 首先,不要尝试为此使用正则表达式。很有可能你会想出一个脆弱/脆弱的解决方案,它会随着HTML的变化而崩溃,或者很难管理和维护。您可以使用Nokogiri快速解析HTML并提取文本:require'nokogiri'h
我想为Heroku构建一个Rails3应用程序。他们使用Postgres作为他们的数据库,所以我通过MacPorts安装了postgres9.0。现在我需要一个postgresgem并且共识是出于性能原因你想要pggem。但是我对我得到的错误感到非常困惑当我尝试在rvm下通过geminstall安装pg时。我已经非常明确地指定了所有postgres目录的位置可以找到但仍然无法完成安装:$envARCHFLAGS='-archx86_64'geminstallpg--\--with-pg-config=/opt/local/var/db/postgresql90/defaultdb/po