我刚刚遇到了 Python 中的描述符，我对“__get__、__set__、__delete__”上的描述符协议(protocol)有了想法，它在包装方法方面确实做得很好。

然而，在the protocol ，还有其他规则:

Data and non-data descriptors differ in how overrides are calculated with respect to entries in an instance’s dictionary. If an instance’s dictionary has an entry with the same name as a data descriptor, the data descriptor takes precedence. If an instance’s dictionary has an entry with the same name as a non-data descriptor, the dictionary entry takes precedence.

我没明白，用经典的方式(实例字典->类字典->基类字典)查找不就可以了吗？
如果以这种方式实现，数据描述符可以由实例持有，并且描述符本身不必持有 weakrefdict 来持有所有者的不同实例的值。
为什么要将描述符放入查找链中？为什么数据描述符放在最开始？

最佳答案

让我们看一个例子:

class GetSetDesc(object):
    def __init__(self, value):
        self.value=value

    def __get__(self, obj, objtype):
        print("get_set_desc: Get")
        return self.value

    def __set__(self, obj, value):
        print("get_set_desc: Set")
        self.value=value

class SetDesc(object):
    def __init__(self, value):
        self.value=value

    def __set__(self, obj, value):
        print("set_desc: Set")
        self.value=value

class GetDesc(object):
    def __init__(self, value):
        self.value=value

    def __get__(self, obj, objtype):
        print("get_desc: Get")
        return self.value

class Test1(object):
    attr=10
    get_set_attr=10
    get_set_attr=GetSetDesc(5)
    set_attr=10
    set_attr=SetDesc(5)
    get_attr=10
    get_attr=GetDesc(5)

class Test2(object):
    def __init__(self):
        self.attr=10
        self.get_set_attr=10
        self.get_set_attr=GetSetDesc(5)
        self.set_attr=10
        self.set_attr=SetDesc(5)
        self.get_attr=10
        self.get_attr=GetDesc(5)

class Test3(Test1):
    def __init__(self):
        #changing values to see differce with superclass
        self.attr=100
        self.get_set_attr=100
        self.get_set_attr=GetSetDesc(50)
        self.set_attr=100
        self.set_attr=SetDesc(50)
        self.get_attr=100
        self.get_attr=GetDesc(50)

class Test4(Test1):
    pass


print("++Test 1 Start++")
t=Test1()

print("t.attr:", t.attr)
print("t.get_set_desc:", t.get_set_attr)
print("t.set_attr:", t.set_attr)
print("t.get_attr:", t.get_attr)

print("Class dict attr:", t.__class__.__dict__['attr'])
print("Class dict get_set_attr:", t.__class__.__dict__['get_set_attr'])
print("Class dict set_attr:", t.__class__.__dict__['set_attr'])
print("Class dict get_attr:", t.__class__.__dict__['get_attr'])

#These will obviously fail as instance dict is empty here
#print("Instance dict attr:", t.__dict__['attr'])
#print("Instance dict get_set_attr:", t.__dict__['get_set_attr'])
#print("Instance dict set_attr:", t.__dict__['set_attr'])
#print("Instance dict get_attr:", t.__dict__['get_attr'])

t.attr=20
t.get_set_attr=20
t.set_attr=20
t.get_attr=20

print("t.attr:", t.attr)
print("t.get_set_desc:", t.get_set_attr)
print("t.set_attr:", t.set_attr)
print("t.get_attr:", t.get_attr)

print("Class dict attr:", t.__class__.__dict__['attr'])
print("Class dict get_set_attr:", t.__class__.__dict__['get_set_attr'])
print("Class dict set_attr:", t.__class__.__dict__['set_attr'])
print("Class dict get_attr:", t.__class__.__dict__['get_attr'])

print("Instance dict attr:", t.__dict__['attr'])
#Next two will fail,
#because the descriptor for those variables has __set__
#on the class itself which was called with value 20,
#so the instance is not affected
#print("Instance dict get_set_attr:", t.__dict__['get_set_attr'])
#print("Instance dict set_attr:", t.__dict__['set_attr'])
print("Instance dict get_attr:", t.__dict__['get_attr'])

print("++Test 1 End++")


print("++Test 2 Start++")
t2=Test2()

print("t.attr:", t2.attr)
print("t.get_set_desc:", t2.get_set_attr)
print("t.set_attr:", t2.set_attr)
print("t.get_attr:", t2.get_attr)

#In this test the class is not affected, so these will fail
#print("Class dict attr:", t2.__class__.__dict__['attr'])
#print("Class dict get_set_attr:", t2.__class__.__dict__['get_set_attr'])
#print("Class dict set_attr:", t2.__class__.__dict__['set_attr'])
#print("Class dict get_attr:", t2.__class__.__dict__['get_attr'])

print("Instance dict attr:", t2.__dict__['attr'])
print("Instance dict get_set_attr:", t2.__dict__['get_set_attr'])
print("Instance dict set_attr:", t2.__dict__['set_attr'])
print("Instance dict get_attr:", t2.__dict__['get_attr'])

t2.attr=20
t2.get_set_attr=20
t2.set_attr=20
t2.get_attr=20

print("t.attr:", t2.attr)
print("t.get_set_desc:", t2.get_set_attr)
print("t.set_attr:", t2.set_attr)
print("t.get_attr:", t2.get_attr)

#In this test the class is not affected, so these will fail
#print("Class dict attr:", t2.__class__.__dict__['attr'])
#print("Class dict get_set_attr:", t2.__class__.__dict__['get_set_attr'])
#print("Class dict set_attr:", t2.__class__.__dict__['set_attr'])
#print("Class dict get_attr:", t2.__class__.__dict__['get_attr'])

print("Instance dict attr:", t2.__dict__['attr'])
print("Instance dict get_set_attr:", t2.__dict__['get_set_attr'])
print("Instance dict set_attr:", t2.__dict__['set_attr'])
print("Instance dict get_attr:", t2.__dict__['get_attr'])

print("++Test 2 End++")


print("++Test 3 Start++")
t3=Test3()

print("t.attr:", t3.attr)
print("t.get_set_desc:", t3.get_set_attr)
print("t.set_attr:", t3.set_attr)
print("t.get_attr:", t3.get_attr)

#These fail, because nothing is defined on Test3 class itself, but let's see its super below
#print("Class dict attr:", t3.__class__.__dict__['attr'])
#print("Class dict get_set_attr:", t3.__class__.__dict__['get_set_attr'])
#print("Class dict set_attr:", t3.__class__.__dict__['set_attr'])
#print("Class dict get_attr:", t3.__class__.__dict__['get_attr'])

#Checking superclass
print("Superclass dict attr:", t3.__class__.__bases__[0].__dict__['attr'])
print("Superclass dict get_set_attr:", t3.__class__.__bases__[0].__dict__['get_set_attr'])
print("Superclass dict set_attr:", t3.__class__.__bases__[0].__dict__['set_attr'])
print("Superclass dict get_attr:", t3.__class__.__bases__[0].__dict__['get_attr'])

print("Instance dict attr:", t3.__dict__['attr'])
#Next two with __set__ inside descriptor fail, because
#when the instance was created, the value inside the descriptor in superclass
#was redefined via __set__
#print("Instance dict get_set_attr:", t3.__dict__['get_set_attr'])
#print("Instance dict set_attr:", t3.__dict__['set_attr'])
print("Instance dict get_attr:", t3.__dict__['get_attr'])
#The one above does not fail, because it doesn't have __set__ in
#descriptor in superclass and therefore was redefined on instance

t3.attr=200
t3.get_set_attr=200
t3.set_attr=200
t3.get_attr=200

print("t.attr:", t3.attr)
print("t.get_set_desc:", t3.get_set_attr)
print("t.set_attr:", t3.set_attr)
print("t.get_attr:", t3.get_attr)

#print("Class dict attr:", t3.__class__.__dict__['attr'])
#print("Class dict get_set_attr:", t3.__class__.__dict__['get_set_attr'])
#print("Class dict set_attr:", t3.__class__.__dict__['set_attr'])
#print("Class dict get_attr:", t3.__class__.__dict__['get_attr'])

#Checking superclass
print("Superclass dict attr:", t3.__class__.__bases__[0].__dict__['attr'])
print("Superclass dict get_set_attr:", t3.__class__.__bases__[0].__dict__['get_set_attr'])
print("Superclass dict set_attr:", t3.__class__.__bases__[0].__dict__['set_attr'])
print("Superclass dict get_attr:", t3.__class__.__bases__[0].__dict__['get_attr'])

print("Instance dict attr:", t3.__dict__['attr'])
#Next two fail, they are in superclass, not in instance
#print("Instance dict get_set_attr:", t3.__dict__['get_set_attr'])
#print("Instance dict set_attr:", t3.__dict__['set_attr'])
print("Instance dict get_attr:", t3.__dict__['get_attr'])
#The one above succeds as it was redefined as stated in prior check

print("++Test 3 End++")


print("++Test 4 Start++")
t4=Test4()

print("t.attr:", t4.attr)
print("t.get_set_desc:", t4.get_set_attr)
print("t.set_attr:", t4.set_attr)
print("t.get_attr:", t4.get_attr)

#These again fail, as everything defined in superclass, not the class itself
#print("Class dict attr:", t4.__class__.__dict__['attr'])
#print("Class dict get_set_attr:", t4.__class__.__dict__['get_set_attr'])
#print("Class dict set_attr:", t4.__class__.__dict__['set_attr'])
#print("Class dict get_attr:", t4.__class__.__dict__['get_attr'])

#Checking superclass
print("Superclass dict attr:", t4.__class__.__bases__[0].__dict__['attr'])
print("Superclass dict get_set_attr:", t4.__class__.__bases__[0].__dict__['get_set_attr'])
print("Superclass dict set_attr:", t4.__class__.__bases__[0].__dict__['set_attr'])
print("Superclass dict get_attr:", t4.__class__.__bases__[0].__dict__['get_attr'])

#Again, everything is on superclass, not the instance
#print("Instance dict attr:", t4.__dict__['attr'])
#print("Instance dict get_set_attr:", t4.__dict__['get_set_attr'])
#print("Instance dict set_attr:", t4.__dict__['set_attr'])
#print("Instance dict get_attr:", t4.__dict__['get_attr'])

t4.attr=200
t4.get_set_attr=200
t4.set_attr=200
t4.get_attr=200

print("t.attr:", t4.attr)
print("t.get_set_desc:", t4.get_set_attr)
print("t.set_attr:", t4.set_attr)
print("t.get_attr:", t4.get_attr)

#Class is not affected by those assignments, next four fail
#print("Class dict attr:", t4.__class__.__dict__['attr'])
#print("Class dict get_set_attr:", t4.__class__.__dict__['get_set_attr'])
#print("Class dict set_attr:", t4.__class__.__dict__['set_attr'])
#print("Class dict get_attr:", t4.__class__.__dict__['get_attr'])

#Checking superclass
print("Superclass dict attr:", t4.__class__.__bases__[0].__dict__['attr'])
print("Superclass dict get_set_attr:", t4.__class__.__bases__[0].__dict__['get_set_attr'])
print("Superclass dict set_attr:", t4.__class__.__bases__[0].__dict__['set_attr'])
print("Superclass dict get_attr:", t4.__class__.__bases__[0].__dict__['get_attr'])

#Now, this one we redefined it succeeds
print("Instance dict attr:", t4.__dict__['attr'])
#This one fails it's still on superclass
#print("Instance dict get_set_attr:", t4.__dict__['get_set_attr'])
#Same here - fails, it's on superclass, because it has __set__
#print("Instance dict set_attr:", t4.__dict__['set_attr'])
#This one succeeds, no __set__ to call, so it was redefined on instance
print("Instance dict get_attr:", t4.__dict__['get_attr'])

print("++Test 4 End++")

输出:

++Test 1 Start++
t.attr: 10
get_set_desc: Get
t.get_set_desc: 5
t.set_attr: <__main__.SetDesc object at 0x02896ED0>
get_desc: Get
t.get_attr: 5
Class dict attr: 10
Class dict get_set_attr: <__main__.GetSetDesc object at 0x02896EB0>
Class dict set_attr: <__main__.SetDesc object at 0x02896ED0>
Class dict get_attr: <__main__.GetDesc object at 0x02896EF0>
get_set_desc: Set
set_desc: Set
t.attr: 20
get_set_desc: Get
t.get_set_desc: 20
t.set_attr: <__main__.SetDesc object at 0x02896ED0>
t.get_attr: 20
Class dict attr: 10
Class dict get_set_attr: <__main__.GetSetDesc object at 0x02896EB0>
Class dict set_attr: <__main__.SetDesc object at 0x02896ED0>
Class dict get_attr: <__main__.GetDesc object at 0x02896EF0>
Instance dict attr: 20
Instance dict get_attr: 20
++Test 1 End++
++Test 2 Start++
t.attr: 10
t.get_set_desc: <__main__.GetSetDesc object at 0x028A0350>
t.set_attr: <__main__.SetDesc object at 0x028A0370>
t.get_attr: <__main__.GetDesc object at 0x028A0330>
Instance dict attr: 10
Instance dict get_set_attr: <__main__.GetSetDesc object at 0x028A0350>
Instance dict set_attr: <__main__.SetDesc object at 0x028A0370>
Instance dict get_attr: <__main__.GetDesc object at 0x028A0330>
t.attr: 20
t.get_set_desc: 20
t.set_attr: 20
t.get_attr: 20
Instance dict attr: 20
Instance dict get_set_attr: 20
Instance dict set_attr: 20
Instance dict get_attr: 20
++Test 2 End++
++Test 3 Start++
get_set_desc: Set
get_set_desc: Set
set_desc: Set
set_desc: Set
t.attr: 100
get_set_desc: Get
t.get_set_desc: <__main__.GetSetDesc object at 0x02896FF0>
t.set_attr: <__main__.SetDesc object at 0x02896ED0>
t.get_attr: <__main__.GetDesc object at 0x028A03F0>
Superclass dict attr: 10
Superclass dict get_set_attr: <__main__.GetSetDesc object at 0x02896EB0>
Superclass dict set_attr: <__main__.SetDesc object at 0x02896ED0>
Superclass dict get_attr: <__main__.GetDesc object at 0x02896EF0>
Instance dict attr: 100
Instance dict get_attr: <__main__.GetDesc object at 0x028A03F0>
get_set_desc: Set
set_desc: Set
t.attr: 200
get_set_desc: Get
t.get_set_desc: 200
t.set_attr: <__main__.SetDesc object at 0x02896ED0>
t.get_attr: 200
Superclass dict attr: 10
Superclass dict get_set_attr: <__main__.GetSetDesc object at 0x02896EB0>
Superclass dict set_attr: <__main__.SetDesc object at 0x02896ED0>
Superclass dict get_attr: <__main__.GetDesc object at 0x02896EF0>
Instance dict attr: 200
Instance dict get_attr: 200
++Test 3 End++
++Test 4 Start++
t.attr: 10
get_set_desc: Get
t.get_set_desc: 200
t.set_attr: <__main__.SetDesc object at 0x02896ED0>
get_desc: Get
t.get_attr: 5
Superclass dict attr: 10
Superclass dict get_set_attr: <__main__.GetSetDesc object at 0x02896EB0>
Superclass dict set_attr: <__main__.SetDesc object at 0x02896ED0>
Superclass dict get_attr: <__main__.GetDesc object at 0x02896EF0>
get_set_desc: Set
set_desc: Set
t.attr: 200
get_set_desc: Get
t.get_set_desc: 200
t.set_attr: <__main__.SetDesc object at 0x02896ED0>
t.get_attr: 200
Superclass dict attr: 10
Superclass dict get_set_attr: <__main__.GetSetDesc object at 0x02896EB0>
Superclass dict set_attr: <__main__.SetDesc object at 0x02896ED0>
Superclass dict get_attr: <__main__.GetDesc object at 0x02896EF0>
Instance dict attr: 200
Instance dict get_attr: 200
++Test 4 End++

亲 body 验一下描述符。但归根结底，我们在这里看到的是......

先从官方文档定义一下，刷一下内存:

If an object defines both __get__() and __set__(), it is considered a data descriptor. Descriptors that only define __get__() are called non-data descriptors (they are typically used for methods but other uses are possible).

从输出和失败的片段...

很明显，在重新分配引用描述符(任何类型)的名称之前，按照 MRO 从类级别到父类(super class)再到定义它的位置，像往常一样查找描述符。 (请参阅测试 2，它在实例中定义并且未被调用，但使用简单值重新定义。)

现在当名称被重新分配时，事情开始变得有趣了:

如果它是一个数据描述符(有 __set__)，那么真的没有魔法发生，分配给引用描述符的变量的值被传递给描述符的 __set__ 并被使用在此方法内部(关于上面的代码，它已分配给 self.value)。描述符首先在层次结构 ofc 中查找。顺便说一句，没有 __get__ 的描述符本身返回，而不是与其 __set__ 方法一起使用的值。

如果它是一个非数据描述符(只有 __get__)，那么它被查找，但是没有 __set__ 方法它被“丢弃”，并且引用这个的变量描述符在尽可能低的级别(实例或子类，取决于我们定义它的位置)重新分配。

所以描述符是用来控制、修改、赋值给变量的数据，这些变量就是做描述符的。所以这是有道理的，如果描述符是定义 __set__ 的数据描述符，它可能想要解析您传递的数据，因此在实例字典键分配之前被调用。这就是为什么它首先放在层次结构中的原因。另一方面，如果它是一个只有 __get__ 的非数据描述符，它可能不关心设置数据，甚至更多——它不能对数据集做任何事情，所以它在分配时从链上掉下来，数据被分配给实例字典键。

此外，新样式类都是关于 MRO(方法 解析顺序)的，因此它会影响每个功能 - 描述符、属性(实际上也是描述符)、特殊方法等。描述符是基本上是在赋值或属性读取时调用的方法，因此在类级别查找它们是有道理的，就像任何其他方法一样。

如果您需要控制分配，但拒绝对变量进行任何更改，请使用数据描述符，但在其 __set__ 方法中引发异常。

关于python - 为什么Python中的属性查找是这样设计的(优先链)？，我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35031182/