我有一个序列(来自 File.walkTopDown)，我需要在每个序列上运行一个长时间运行的操作。我想使用 Kotlin 最佳实践/协程，但我要么没有并行性，要么并行性太多，并遇到“打开文件太多”的 IO 错误。

File("/Users/me/Pictures/").walkTopDown()
    .onFail { file, ex -> println("ERROR: $file caused $ex") }
    .filter { ... only big images... }
    .map { file ->
        async { // I *think* I want async and not "launch"...
            ImageProcessor.fromFile(file)
        }
    }

这似乎不是并行运行的，而且我的多核 CPU 永远不会超过 1 个 CPU 的值(value)。有没有办法使用协程来运行“NumberOfCores 并行操作”的延迟作业？

我看了Multithreading using Kotlin Coroutines首先创建所有作业然后加入它们，但这意味着在繁重的处理加入步骤之前完成序列/文件树遍历，这似乎......将其拆分为收集和处理步骤意味着收集可以在处理之前运行。

val jobs = ... the Sequence above...
    .toSet()
println("Found ${jobs.size}")
jobs.forEach { it.await() }

最佳答案

这不是针对您的问题，但它确实回答了“如何限制 kotlin 协程最大并发性”的问题。

编辑:从 kotlinx.coroutines 1.6.0 ( https://github.com/Kotlin/kotlinx.coroutines/issues/2919 ) 开始，您可以使用 limitedParallelism，例如Dispatchers.IO.limitedParallelism(123).

旧解决方案:一开始我想使用 newFixedThreadPoolContext，但是 1) it's deprecated和 2) 它会使用线程，我认为这不是必要或不可取的(与 Executors.newFixedThreadPool().asCoroutineDispatcher() 相同)。此解决方案可能存在使用 Semaphore 时我不知道的缺陷，但很简单:

import kotlinx.coroutines.async
import kotlinx.coroutines.awaitAll
import kotlinx.coroutines.coroutineScope
import kotlinx.coroutines.sync.Semaphore
import kotlinx.coroutines.sync.withPermit

/**
 * Maps the inputs using [transform] at most [maxConcurrency] at a time until all Jobs are done.
 */
suspend fun <TInput, TOutput> Iterable<TInput>.mapConcurrently(
    maxConcurrency: Int,
    transform: suspend (TInput) -> TOutput,
) = coroutineScope {
    val gate = Semaphore(maxConcurrency)
    this@mapConcurrently.map {
        async {
            gate.withPermit {
                transform(it)
            }
        }
    }.awaitAll()
}

测试(抱歉，它使用 Spek、hamcrest 和 kotlin 测试):

import kotlinx.coroutines.ExperimentalCoroutinesApi
import kotlinx.coroutines.delay
import kotlinx.coroutines.launch
import kotlinx.coroutines.runBlocking
import kotlinx.coroutines.test.TestCoroutineDispatcher
import org.hamcrest.MatcherAssert.assertThat
import org.hamcrest.Matchers.greaterThanOrEqualTo
import org.hamcrest.Matchers.lessThanOrEqualTo
import org.spekframework.spek2.Spek
import org.spekframework.spek2.style.specification.describe
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger
import kotlin.test.assertEquals

@OptIn(ExperimentalCoroutinesApi::class)
object AsyncHelpersKtTest : Spek({
    val actionDelay: Long = 1_000 // arbitrary; obvious if non-test dispatcher is used on accident
    val testDispatcher = TestCoroutineDispatcher()

    afterEachTest {
        // Clean up the TestCoroutineDispatcher to make sure no other work is running.
        testDispatcher.cleanupTestCoroutines()
    }

    describe("mapConcurrently") {
        it("should run all inputs concurrently if maxConcurrency >= size") {
            val concurrentJobCounter = AtomicInteger(0)
            val inputs = IntRange(1, 2).toList()
            val maxConcurrency = inputs.size

            // https://github.com/Kotlin/kotlinx.coroutines/issues/1266 has useful info & examples
            runBlocking(testDispatcher) {
                print("start runBlocking $coroutineContext\n")

                // We have to run this async so that the code afterwards can advance the virtual clock
                val job = launch {
                    testDispatcher.pauseDispatcher {
                        val result = inputs.mapConcurrently(maxConcurrency) {
                            print("action $it $coroutineContext\n")

                            // Sanity check that we never run more in parallel than max
                            assertThat(concurrentJobCounter.addAndGet(1), lessThanOrEqualTo(maxConcurrency))

                            // Allow for virtual clock adjustment
                            delay(actionDelay)

                            // Sanity check that we never run more in parallel than max
                            assertThat(concurrentJobCounter.getAndAdd(-1), lessThanOrEqualTo(maxConcurrency))
                            print("action $it after delay $coroutineContext\n")

                            it
                        }

                        // Order is not guaranteed, thus a Set
                        assertEquals(inputs.toSet(), result.toSet())
                        print("end mapConcurrently $coroutineContext\n")
                    }
                }
                print("before advanceTime $coroutineContext\n")

                // Start the coroutines
                testDispatcher.advanceTimeBy(0)
                assertEquals(inputs.size, concurrentJobCounter.get(), "All jobs should have been started")

                testDispatcher.advanceTimeBy(actionDelay)
                print("after advanceTime $coroutineContext\n")
                assertEquals(0, concurrentJobCounter.get(), "All jobs should have finished")
                job.join()
            }
        }

        it("should run one at a time if maxConcurrency = 1") {
            val concurrentJobCounter = AtomicInteger(0)
            val inputs = IntRange(1, 2).toList()
            val maxConcurrency = 1

            runBlocking(testDispatcher) {
                val job = launch {
                    testDispatcher.pauseDispatcher {
                        inputs.mapConcurrently(maxConcurrency) {
                            assertThat(concurrentJobCounter.addAndGet(1), lessThanOrEqualTo(maxConcurrency))
                            delay(actionDelay)
                            assertThat(concurrentJobCounter.getAndAdd(-1), lessThanOrEqualTo(maxConcurrency))
                            it
                        }
                    }
                }

                testDispatcher.advanceTimeBy(0)
                assertEquals(1, concurrentJobCounter.get(), "Only one job should have started")

                val elapsedTime = testDispatcher.advanceUntilIdle()
                print("elapsedTime=$elapsedTime")
                assertThat(
                    "Virtual time should be at least as long as if all jobs ran sequentially",
                    elapsedTime,
                    greaterThanOrEqualTo(actionDelay * inputs.size)
                )
                job.join()
            }
        }

        it("should handle cancellation") {
            val jobCounter = AtomicInteger(0)
            val inputs = IntRange(1, 2).toList()
            val maxConcurrency = 1

            runBlocking(testDispatcher) {
                val job = launch {
                    testDispatcher.pauseDispatcher {
                        inputs.mapConcurrently(maxConcurrency) {
                            jobCounter.addAndGet(1)
                            delay(actionDelay)
                            it
                        }
                    }
                }

                testDispatcher.advanceTimeBy(0)
                assertEquals(1, jobCounter.get(), "Only one job should have started")

                job.cancel()
                testDispatcher.advanceUntilIdle()
                assertEquals(1, jobCounter.get(), "Only one job should have run")
                job.join()
            }
        }
    }
})

根据 https://play.kotlinlang.org/hands-on/Introduction%20to%20Coroutines%20and%20Channels/09_Testing ，您可能还需要调整编译器参数以运行测试:

compileTestKotlin {
    kotlinOptions {
        // Needed for runBlocking test coroutine dispatcher?
        freeCompilerArgs += "-Xuse-experimental=kotlin.Experimental"
        freeCompilerArgs += "-Xopt-in=kotlin.RequiresOptIn"
    }
}
testImplementation 'org.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-coroutines-test:1.4.1'

关于multithreading - 如何限制 kotlin 协程的最大并发性，我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47686353/